So, been looking through SB's NSFD forums and found this:
At this point, you'll have to literally exterminate Greenpeace from this Earth, put guns at the heads of NIMBYs and tell them deal with it, and do a fine-tooth-comb check on all the red tape and safety regulations to see what is simply there to fuck nuclear over and what is genuinely there for safety reasons.
What is your thoughts?
This... is deeply disturbing IMHO... especially with the horror show that is coming up thanks to Climate Change is on the horizon.Probably not.
That is the conclusion of a remarkable new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in early July — remarkable because it is not written by opponents of nuclear power, as one might expect given the conclusion. The authors are in fact extremely supportive of nuclear and view its loss as a matter of "profound concern":
Achieving deep decarbonization of the energy system will require a portfolio of every available technology and strategy we can muster. It should be a source of profound concern for all who care about climate change that, for entirely predictable and resolvable reasons, the United States appears set to virtually lose nuclear power, and thus a wedge of reliable and low-carbon energy, over the next few decades.
At this point, you'll have to literally exterminate Greenpeace from this Earth, put guns at the heads of NIMBYs and tell them deal with it, and do a fine-tooth-comb check on all the red tape and safety regulations to see what is simply there to fuck nuclear over and what is genuinely there for safety reasons.
What is your thoughts?