Neither genocide nor concentration camps are strangers to the US military soI find it hilarious that you're saying basically saying "people advocating for genocide and concentration camps deserve to feel safe." While being in the military.
Neither genocide nor concentration camps are strangers to the US military soI find it hilarious that you're saying basically saying "people advocating for genocide and concentration camps deserve to feel safe." While being in the military.
It's more that the "by any means necessary" people have zero fucking integrity in their accusations, routinely using it for every flavor of authoritarian, nationalist or identitarian that disagrees with them, and loads of people who are not meaningfully any of those things. Like Rodyle, who still completely refuses to give a definition of fascist with discription of how it applies to me.This is like saying murder and killing in self-defense are morally equivalent.
Like Rodyle, who still completely refuses to give a definition of fascist with discription of how it applies to me.
Dude you support rape dogs. I think fitting you in with fascists isn't too far a stretch.It's more that the "by any means necessary" people have zero fucking integrity in their accusations, routinely using it for every flavor of authoritarian, nationalist or identitarian that disagrees with them, and loads of people who are not meaningfully any of those things. Like Rodyle, who still completely refuses to give a definition of fascist with discription of how it applies to me.
It's not that they're indistinguishable. Different arguments are presented against them, we don't think they're the same beyond finding both utterly unacceptable. Political violence in response to what are, at the moment, purely words is unacceptable. And that is the standard. It's all "preventative measures" without ever having anything resembling a trial. There is no articulation to the claim a person is a fascist before using violence on them, and no warning.
It is, to be blunt, a fucking witch hunt. Which is not acceptable.
Pinochet was a bastardthe hell is a rape dog?
What is wrong with people, and why haven't they been hanged? That is how we deal with those guilty of crimes against humanity at the Hague right?Pinochet was a bastard
The problem is, that your definition of nazi includes everone, who disagrees with you.This is like saying murder and killing in self-defense are morally equivalent.
The problem is, that your definition of nazi includes everone, who disagrees with you.
I thought the definition is already pretty clear.That's the problem.
Well, lets come up with a concrete definition and smash the fash away, once we get that part straightened out and agree
Nazism said:a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
Neo-nazism said:Neo-Nazism consists of post-World War IImilitant social or political movements seeking to revive and implement the ideology of Nazism. Neo-Nazis seek to employ their ideology to promote hatred and attack minorities, or in some cases to create a fascist political state.
The problem is that the definitions you posted is not what a lot of people use. Words don't mean anything anymore so go nuts and use whatever definition you want.I thought the definition is already pretty clear ?
Does this mean that my definition of nazi can include Antifa mambers ?The problem is that the definitions you posted is not what a lot of people use. Words don't mean anything anymore so go nuts and use whatever definition you want.
Groups like Antifa are idiots of the highest order, so yeah go nuts.Does this mean that my definition of nazi can include Antifa mambers ?
Oh, wait...
I forget the thread at this point but it's why Horton officially ruled we can call him a fascist freely, despite Adorable's objectionsWhat is wrong with people, and why haven't they been hanged? That is how we deal with those guilty of crimes against humanity at the Hague right?
Also some proof that morphile supports "that" before I put him on a list please
I thought the definition is already pretty clear.
Because they're all interrelated.It's more that the "by any means necessary" people have zero fucking integrity in their accusations, routinely using it for every flavor of authoritarian, nationalist or identitarian
Do I? Because I'm pretty sure I disagree with Liberals and Leftists without calling them Nazis. I'm pretty sure I only use Nazi as a short-hand for Fascists and crypto-Fascist conservatives.The problem is, that your definition of nazi includes everone, who disagrees with you.
https://www.frozenincarbonite.org/threads/is-capitalism-on-its-way-out.613/page-6#post-24851What is wrong with people, and why haven't they been hanged? That is how we deal with those guilty of crimes against humanity at the Hague right?
Also some proof that morphile supports "that" before I put him on a list please
I wouldn't put those two in the same sentence, I don't think blaire has done anything anywhere near as damaging as Milo "man boy love" Yiannopoulos. I personally know conservatives who point to milo as justification for believeing gay=pedophile.
You insult people by using language they would find insulting. It's really that simple.
I forget the thread at this point but it's why Horton officially ruled we can call him a fascist freely, despite Adorable's objections
By the way the rape dogs aren't the worst part of the Pinochet story. So let that sink in.
Pinochet was a bastard
Except you do.Do I? Because I'm pretty sure I disagree with Liberals and Leftists without calling them Nazis. I'm pretty sure I only use Nazi as a short-hand for Fascists and crypto-Fascist conservatives.
He was defending consorting with Fascists and normalizing their rhetoric.Was he acting like fash trash?
Oh so at the very least a fascist enablerHe was defending consorting with Fascists and normalizing their rhetoric.
I forget the thread at this point but it's why Horton officially ruled we can call him a fascist freely, despite Adorable's objections
By the way the rape dogs aren't the worst part of the Pinochet story. So let that sink in.
thank you for the information the "list" has been revised. I suppose for him I'll hope he adopts a more multilateral approach to his problem solving and discovers the difference between outright lies backed by theft and real efficiencyhttps://www.frozenincarbonite.org/threads/is-capitalism-on-its-way-out.613/page-6#post-24851
You can use this to get the context, Morphile was offering a broad defense of Pinochet murdering and raping leftists and support of a violent coup against democratically elected government in the name of some unfounded fear of potential of economic hardship.
Also: