Who studied physics here, you or me? You take the values and you multiply them until you get the result, that's how it works.Nein, physics is how an event occurs in the actual world and our explanations for why it does so. Their argument would only apply if Dresden was down to 1 smelter to toss corpses into instead of being firebombed. So it probably didnt happen the way they indicate.
*Hon hons victoriously*
who's the quack though?Who studied physics here, you or me? You take the values and you multiply them until you get the result, that's how it works.
It's Doctor Quack. But if you want a second opinion: @Vorpal, was there anything whatsoever in the History of physics that was more than multiplying values together until you reached the result? Anything at all?who's the quack though?
you mean Doctor Who?It's Doctor Quack. But if you want a second opinion: @Vorpal, was there anything whatsoever in the History of physics that was more than multiplying values together until you reached the result? Anything at all?
Personally, I'm not sure how to describe myself. I think the closest thing is a social liberal. Like in one way I'm all in for free market but In another with protection from government tow workers and as big social as it is possible.
What?Free market
Social democracy
Pick one
In America maybe. In EU not really.Free market
Social democracy
Pick one
Depends, the EU has a much freer market than the US, with stronger regulations to prevent monopolies and abuse of dominant positions through governmental corruption. It's not the social democracies that destroy Net Neutrality, one of the pillars of modern free markets. It's not the social democracies that have an outrageously protectionist economy combined with government-coordinated tech sectors.Free market
Social democracy
Pick one
Who studied physics here, you or me? You take the values and you multiply them until you get the result, that's how it works.
Methodology is simple. You take values, you multiply. That's how physics work, period.Is methodology i disagree with.
Cannot take 11 years to burn bodies because bodies burning in similar timeframe not one after another. His implication being that dresden impossible because it can't have taken 11 years or something. Which ignores that multiple bodies can burn at same time, and at varying temperatures. So I am right.
So checkmate I win?
Depends, the EU has a much freer market than the US, with stronger regulations to prevent monopolies and abuse of dominant positions through governmental corruption. It's not the social democracies that destroy Net Neutrality, one of the pillars of modern free markets. It's not the social democracies that have an outrageously protectionist economy combined with government-coordinated tech sectors.
Oh great, you complain about United "fuck EU we want to deregulate everything to praise Thatcher beyond the grave" Kingdom and Greece, AKA "let's have colossal tax fraud and lie to everyone about our finance then look surprised when we cannot afford our social safety net. You'd be more amusing if you actually had arguments instead of rehashing the same bullshit over and over again everytime we call you on your crap.Cute. You mean the same Europe which has hollowed out its social safety nets through austerity and is playing race to the bottom. But hey, keep playing Ode to Joy and imagining Europe returning the world to its pre 1945 Enlightened Imperial era because it now has a few nice words on paper to make things all better.
Ah so what acording to EU should do hmm? Become like wet dream of libertarian or US 2.0 with corporations doing almost whatever they wish, education making young people in debt high enough like hell and few other things.Cute. You mean the same Europe which has hollowed out its social safety nets through austerity and is playing race to the bottom. But hey, keep playing Ode to Joy and imagining Europe returning the world to its pre 1945 Enlightened Imperial era because it now has a few nice words on paper to make things all better.
Given what he complains about, I'm pretty sure he wants people to pay zero tax and get massive social safety nets anyway. That's the only reason he'd complain about the Greek situation.Ah so what acording to EU should do hmm? Become like wet dream of libertarian or US 2.0 with corporations doing almost whatever they wish, education making young people in debt high enough like hell and few other things.
Ah, so he is schizophrenic. Because that's the only way how you can have both of these things at the same time.Given what he complains about, I'm pretty sure he wants people to pay zero tax and get massive social safety nets anyway. That's the only reason he'd complain about the Greek situation.
I mean there's always seigniorage, but that's technically a tax anyway and a pretty crappy one.Ah, so he is schizophrenic. Because that's the only way how you can have both of these things at the same time.
Ah, so he is schizophrenic. Because that's the only way how you can have both of these things at the same time.
Yeah the education system is a libertarian dream...Ah so what acording to EU should do hmm? Become like wet dream of libertarian or US 2.0 with corporations doing almost whatever they wish, education making young people in debt high enough like hell and few other things.
Welcome to Earth? Exploitation of other nations and populations will happen under any system because the makers of said system being implemented by humans. Also the Earth is actually improving, the third world is no longer wallowing in so much poverty as the majority of humanity is now middle-class for the first time in history. The main concern should be simple trust busting to prevent stagnation and ensure a truly free market (as regulation is necessary for such to exist, sorry ANCAPs), not diving into Communism which is a dark pit that has claimed millions of lives and devoured multiple nations and one superpower. Along with being highly susceptible to full totalitarianism, chief examples being Stalin and Mao.
I'd much rather bridge the weakness of the democratic president and the strength of the autocrat with a constitutional monarch which sits long enough to develop consistent long-term foreign policy without the bipolar-ness of the US political system which flips around as presidents change. Without totally sacrificing the people's ability to counter the state via a counterbalanced legislative body.