Different cultures have different perceptions on the value of wit and sarcasm. In good part this is due to Historical elements, as in many European cultures, wit and parody were the only available tool for political criticism, and the greatest European philosophers of the Enlightenment gave this art its letters of nobility with books still studied to this very day there. But this is not the culture shared by the dominant group - relatively speaking - on SB, for which the art of debating is grounded in other traditions.
And, as I said, generalizing the use of pattern recognition on a forum like SB would make it much more vulnerable to the exploitation of logical fallacies and would have given an overly large power to users either willing to spend as much time as I do gathering the pattern data of SB or those willing to engage in active disinformation and well poisoning. A conclusion that, I believe, some of the staff came to eventually, with logical consequences.
And, as I said, generalizing the use of pattern recognition on a forum like SB would make it much more vulnerable to the exploitation of logical fallacies and would have given an overly large power to users either willing to spend as much time as I do gathering the pattern data of SB or those willing to engage in active disinformation and well poisoning. A conclusion that, I believe, some of the staff came to eventually, with logical consequences.
If some faggots can't handle your tiny banter and cheekiness, they damn well should just close up shop and be a private site for special snowflakes like themselves.
You never were a problem in my eyes, you were damned professional, at least in the War Room.